I know that "kids today" and even old fogies like myself are using some email slang, not using proper punctuation, leaving out letters for faster IM and text capabilities. However, I received this email from someone in another office. Seriously.
if u are referering to a dd2875, the IASO cn sign block 22,and g2 security manager completes part III.
G8 should have its own IASO. if u don't have one yet, I cn sign block 22.
It takes only a fraction of a second longer to type "you" than u. U is not appropriate. Cn is not can. Referering? This is ridiculous.
And this person did not answer my question.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
COMPLETELY unprofessional.
Posted by Heather and Stephen at 10:09 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
OMGYG2BK! LSHMBH! T+TTTT.
luv~kc
oh my god you've got 2 be kidding.
laughing so hard my belly hurts.
think positive - these things take time.
love you!
Totally unprofessional! Question - was this person using a crackberry or similar gadget when responding? If so, I MIGHT be able to see it, but still totally un-pro, IMHO (in my humble opinion)!!
I wonder why they spelled out "are" and especially "one" since it has a legitimate one letter substitution, and then used cn for can?
I hope I never learn this language, although I'm pretty sure ex-English teacher hubby will never let that happen.
Sure won't!
You'd be amazed at how poorly the average chiropractic student's grammar is these days. I proofread a lot of papers around here!
Oh, how the irony hangs thick in the air. And I read that comment twice, just to be sure.
Post a Comment